Every founder we talk to has the wrong idea about this one. Some think it is only for biotech and people in lab coats. Others think building anything new automatically qualifies. Both are wrong. It has nothing to do with what you built. It is about whether you were solving something with a genuinely uncertain outcome, and whether you can prove it after the fact.
Before you even call an accountant, run your project through this:
Here is the part that trips people up most: a plain looking website can have a legitimate claim buried in it if part of the build genuinely stumped you, and a shiny new framework can have zero claimable R&D if the path to build it was obvious the whole time. The label on the project means nothing. What happened while you were building it is what matters.
One more thing: this is not tax advice, it is a starting point. If a few of these hit close to home, get a proper R&D tax advisor involved before you register anything.
Still have questions? Give us a call, , or send us a message to understand more without any pushy sales tactics.
Whether you've got a detailed brief or just a rough idea, we're happy to have a conversation.
No pitch, no pressure, just a straight talk about what you're working on and whether we're the right fit.